For many months I have said that the banks will have to admit where they over-lent, write off some principal and start working with homeowners to keep as many as possible in their homes. Friday we got some encouraging news from JP Morgan.
“JPMorgan Chase & Co., the largest U.S. bank by market value, said it won't begin new foreclosure proceedings on some loans while it finds ways to make payments easier on $110 billion of problem mortgages.
Within the next 90 days, the bank, which two weeks ago accepted a $25 billion cash infusion from the government, will examine loans and may agree to reduce interest rates or principal amounts, New York-based JPMorgan said today in a statement. It will also open 24 centers to provide counseling in areas with high delinquency rates.
Congress has been urging financial-services companies to work with borrowers and avoid foreclosures, which rose to the highest on record in the third quarter. Bank of America Corp. said it will help more than 630,000 at-risk borrowers stay in their homes.”
Finally some steps in the right direction to help heal the housing market…
Follow
____________________________
____________________________
Danielle’s Book
Media Reviews
“An explosive critique about the investment industry: provocative and well worth reading.”
Financial Post“Juggling Dynamite, #1 pick for best new books about money and markets.”
Money Sense“Park manages to not only explain finances well for the average person, she also manages to entertain and educate while cutting through the clutter of information she knows every investor faces.”
Toronto SunSubscribe
This Month
Archives
Log In
I can't believe you are supporting this? So, anybody who speculated on their housing, and lost, is going to be rewarded? What about those people who were prudent about not buying a house and saving money?
For example, how would you feel if those people who lost in the markets recently were reimbursed while you, who were prudently invested in cash like instruments get nothing?
I share the sentiment. While this may be good for the overall economy (a big maybe here) the move penalizes those who were prudent enough to stay out of the real estate feeding frenzy. Now, rather than reaping the rewards of their fiscal discipline, those who did not speculate or buy into something they could not afford are forced to bail out those who did. What a shame.
Marcus
I lean towards the Austrian School of Economics. The more the government interferes the more potential problems they create. Many argue that the current crisis was caused because of this interference.
thank for sharing the information with us