A couple of charts this snowy Saturday

Bouncing back from a brutal flu this week.  Wow! So good to have energy levels back near norm.  How we take excellent health for granted. I was thinking about those suffering from Ebola and other illnesses who don’t have first world comforts the past few days….

Also had extra time to do nothing but think in silence.  As always, clarity comes from quiet reflection.  Media this morning is all about the weakening global economy and soaring asset markets on news of another desperate rate cut in China and hopes for even moar Quantitative Easing–this time promised yet again by the ECB’s Mario Draghi.  In reality convincing the Germans to buy bad debts off other insolvent EU members will do nothing to alter the reality of a world economy oppressed by more debt than can ever be repaid.

While record share buy backs by corporations the past 3 years have managed to manufacture earnings growth out of falling sales, no honest analyst with a straight face can acknowledge the glaring gap below between the S&P 500 price level and earnings growth since 2011 and call it rational pricing.

QE and EPS

The fact is that financial ‘engineering’ aside, it takes customer spending to drive sales and it takes sales to drive nominal GDP growth. Far from driving sales, as shown below, zero interest rate policies and quantitative easing have perversely suppressed cash flow while driving up asset prices. This makes future investment returns grim and negative from here. (Clearly corporations agree, as they have elected to use more than 80% of their cash to buy back shares and pay dividends rather than invest in business development or expansion the past 4 years).

There is no free lunch ever. Worse, QE has been a waste of funds and an expensive distraction from necessary reforms. A foolish indulgence for which today’s wildly inflated asset markets must eventually pay in spades.

GDP and S&P

Posted in Main Page | Comments Off on A couple of charts this snowy Saturday

Money Talk radio today

Danielle was a guest with Michael Campbell on Money Talk radio today discussing risk management amid the mayhem of a slowing global economy and over-valued asset markets. You can listen here by advancing the play bar to 10:06.

Posted in Main Page | Comments Off on Money Talk radio today

Secular bears die in mean reversion not wishful thinking

My recent article picked up by Seeking Alpha, S&P 500: generational opportunity in the making, sparked a flurry of reader comments some of which underlined just how little is understood about the cause and progress of secular bears. For those seeking more education and understanding, I highly recommend some time on Ed Easterling’s excellent site here at Crestmont Research. He has also written a couple of helpful books on the topic, see his latest Probable Outcomes, Secular stock market insights.

Some have optimistically asserted that the secular bear for stocks that began in 2000 off the highest stock valuations ever in history, ended in 2013 on some of the second highest stock valuations in history because the S&P 500 index finally broke above the previous 2007 cyclical peak.  If only a fresh nominal high in stock prices after 7 years of making back losses solved the problem!

Unfortunately fresh nominal highs aren’t the secular bear-ending-test.  A fresh nominal high for the S&P in 1972, did nothing to end the vicious down cycles of lower lows, that ran between 1966 to 1982.  It took a series of crushing cyclical declines before the secular bear could finally be killed.  Here’s Ed’s chart for those who want to see it.

In reality, secular bear-ending-progress requires mean reversion on a host of reliable metrics from historic highs to historic lows.  See a great visual summary here:  Secular cycle dashboard. (I also have included reference links on some of the key ones as I discuss below).

On the economic rejuvenation side, it will require at least a halving of today’s sky high total debt levels and oppressively large financial sector, along with a sustained uptrend in household income (flat now for 27 years) and doubling of saving rates (from today’s tiny 5% to historical norm’s above 10%).

On the investment side it will require at least a halving of today’s record after tax corporate profits/GDP (today 100% above historic norms), earnings per share, price to earnings (today 26 vs.secular bull births around 8), Tobin Q–market value of equities and debt over corporate net worth (today 1.12 vs .30 at birth of secular bulls), and Buffett’s favorite valuation measure–Market cap of US stocks/GDP (today at 127% versus a historical median of 65%).

Not to mention a crushing of animal spirits from today’s extinct bear sentiment (14.8% bearish Investor Intelligence, vs a long term mean of 30% and >50% at the start of previous secular bulls,  and a double, even triple, of today’s miniscule dividend yields (today about 2% to the 7%+ levels that marked the end of previous secular bears).

Just as liposuction doesn’t create fitness, quick price spikes and wishful thinking do not end secular bears.  Clearly this one has a lot more work ahead of it before we can earn the next 15 to 20 year, organically driven, investment boom, known as a secular bull.  See: Ed’s PE Report for more facts and context:

“The only way to reposition into a secular bull market is to experience a decline in the stock market due to significant inflation or deflation. This can occur either by a significant decline over a short period of time (e.g. the early 1930s secular bear market) or by minimal decline over a longer period of time (e.g. the 1960s-1970s secular bear market)…

Secular bull markets can only occur when P/E ratios get low enough (due to high inflation or significant deflation) to then double or triple as inflation returns to a low level. As a result, secular market cycles are not driven by time, but rather they are dependent upon distance—as measured by the decline in P/E to a low enough level to then enable it to have a significant increase.”

Posted in Main Page | Comments Off on Secular bears die in mean reversion not wishful thinking