Increased regulation leaves less room for bank profits

Good discussion and good charts on the bank index reminding that even after an incredible rally the past 2 years paid for by central banks, the US bank share index has just retraced half of shareholder losses in 2007-09.

Graham Fisher Managing Director Josh Rosner, Bloomberg’s Phil Mattingly and Adam Johnson discuss the Volcker Rule ahead of approval by U.S. regulators.Here is a direct video link.

Posted in Main Page | Comments Off on Increased regulation leaves less room for bank profits

Volcker–for better and worse

Today we have the vote finally to implement the long delayed “Volcker Rule” to reign in proprietary double-dealing trading at big banks. The wording just last week morphed into a tougher stance with an outright ban on the nebulous “portfolio hedging” category that has come to encompass all manner of speculating at the taxpayer’s peril. See: Volcker trims the banking hedge. Last night wording was apparently watered down again at the financial lobby’s relentless behest to an allowance for prop trading but a restriction that bonus compensation not be directly tied to it. The bank lobby says the law is too strict and it won’t help to reduce systemic risk. Bank critics say that the rule is too weak and will only encourage the banks to find profitable workarounds and will therefore not reduce systemic risk.

In truth, great complexity, abuse and unintended harms have been born of the refusal (to date) to simply reinstate a division between traditional banking backed by deposit insurance/tax payers (deposits and lending) and the speculating and risk taking that should be allowed only at the financial peril of actors with their own personal skin in the game. Formal investigations have repeatedly confirmed that the implicit safety net of government backing to risk-seeking activities was a significant cause of the financial crisis of 2008 and continues to embolden investment banking conglomerates unto today.

The Volcker Rule in its present incantation is a start that will no doubt cause investment banks some frustration and loss of some profits. But the stage remains set for a further push now to enact the Glass Steagall 2.0 bill which was tabled by Senators Elizabeth Warren (D) and John McCain (R) last summer. 30 short pages of wisdom, clarity and effective policy, read their bill here for a quick reminder of the history and evolution of the rules that were implemented, repealed and are now desperately needed once more.

Posted in Main Page | Comments Off on Volcker–for better and worse

Canadian housing market and downside for banks

“Amateur landlords are rampant in the Toronto condo market…50-60% of condos under construction are being sold not for owner-occupied but for “investment purposes”…this could hurt the Canadian banks but also the bank investors” [shareholders].Here is a direct video link.

Sure one could buy or hold Canadian banks here for the 3-4% dividend income….so long as one doesn’t mind holding through capital implosion in the process. Remember a cyclical gain of 100% is completely extinguished in a price decline of 50%, and the downcycles typically move at lightening speed compared with the multiyear price recoveries.

Chart source: Cory Venable, CMT, Venable Park Investment Counsel Inc.

Posted in Main Page | Comments Off on Canadian housing market and downside for banks