A platform worth voting for

This article encapsulates the discussion America should be having leading into the election of their next commander-in-chief. Sadly, no political candidates or leaders today are anywhere close to admitting these truths. And yet, they must before the world will get to the necessary excision and rehabilitation from our credit cancer. On the upside, the numbers are so staggering and the elephant in the room so enormous, that no amount of rhetoric or polish will be able to cover it up indefinitely. As the citizens of Spain, Italy and Greece increasingly take to the streets today, rising against their captured-by-the bankers-governments, the citizens of America can see a glimpse of the future so long as they continue to deny what happened and what needs to be done next. Read: “The speech that wins the election.

Posted in Main Page | 4 Comments

Canadian housing downturn attracting attention

Sales of new homes and condominiums in the Greater Toronto Area declined in August, the Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD) reported today:

“According to RealNet Canada Inc., BILD’s official source of new home market intelligence, the 1,242 homes sold in August 2012 add up to the lowest monthly sales since 2009 and the lowest August on record. Year-to-date sales have remained on par with 2010 but below its record-breaking 2011 predecessor.”

The Huffington Post picked up on the recent data yesterday and pointed out that while lower prices would be a help to would-be-buyers, the adjustment in Canada’s now housing-dependent, over-indebted, domestic economy is likely to be painful:

“While many prospective home buyers may cheer to hear that homes could soon be more affordable, at least in Toronto, economists warn that a significant slowdown in housing could have repercussions for the entire economy.

In a report issued last month, Scotiabank warned that “balance sheets heavily skewed to real estate leave Canadians vulnerable to an adverse shock, including a sharp rise in unemployment and/or a sharp drop in home prices.”

Scotia predicted that home prices would decline on average 10 per cent across the country, and the market would take a decade to recover, based on previous housing market cycles.

But Capital Economics predicts a 25-per-cent decline in house prices, which would inevitably lead to rising unemployment. As BILD noted in its report, there are 193,000 people employed in construction in Toronto alone.

Posted in Main Page | 12 Comments

Warning: 93% of financial commentators offer misleading B.S.

This article, “Dow will repeat 2007-2008 peak-crash cycle: It’s deja vu as lessons of meltdown go unheeded” strikes a chord this morning as I prepare for my next business publication interview where the author would like to know my “2 best stock picks” for the next 6 months. This is a typical format and a frequent challenge as someone who is called 2-4 times a week for media interviews and speaks at at least 1 financial trade show a month. I can honestly say that I am frequently sickened by my peer group.

Most commentators are sell-side or long-always managers whose business model makes them congenitally wired to always say that people should be buying and holding stocks regardless of price, regardless of the person’s age or circumstances, regardless of where we may be in a business cycle, regardless of the probabilities for capital loss. Business media collects its revenue from the sell-side, long always firms. It has self-styled its business model as the source “for information so that viewers know what to do with their money”, and many of the anchors and hosts certainly seem to have deluded themselves into thinking that they are offering important insight and information. But in reality a more honest mission statement would read “the source for publicly traded companies and financial firms to flog themselves to new, mesmerized, victims.”

The article offers a wonderful laundry list of some well known offenders. But most important is the realization that these same people and their many colleagues are saying the same bullish things today that they have continued to say through the past 13 years of a secular bear market where their followers and clients have suffered huge risk and huge stress and have flat to negative gains for the experience.

“So if you remember nothing else today, here’s your big take-away: You can never trust Wall Street bulls, they’re lying to you 93% of the time. Studies tell us analysts signal “buys” vastly more than “sells.” And behavioral-science research tells us that bankers, traders and other market insiders are misleading us, manipulating us 93% of the time in their securities reports, PR, ads, speeches, sales material, in their predictions on television, cable shows and when quoted in newspapers and magazines…

March 1999: Harry S. Dent, author of “The Roaring 2000s.” “There has been a paradigm shift.” The New Economy arrived, this time really is different.

October 1999: James Glassman, author, “Dow 36,000.” “What is dangerous is for Americans not to be in the market. We’re going to reach a point where stocks are correctly priced … it’s not a bubble … The stock market is undervalued.”

August 1999: Charles Kadlec, author, “Dow 100,000.” “The DJIA will reach 100,000 in 2020 after “two decades of above-average economic growth with price stability.”

December 1999: Joseph Battipaglia, market analyst. “Some fear a burst Internet bubble, but our analysis shows that Internet companies … carry expected long-term growth rates twice other rapidly growing segments within tech.”

December 1999: Larry Wachtel, Prudential. “Most of these stocks are reasonably priced. There’s no reason for them to correct violently in the year 2000.” Nasdaq lost over 50%.

December 1999: Ralph Acampora, Prudential Securities. “I’m not saying this is a straight line up. … I’m saying any kind of declines, buy them!”

February 2000: Larry Kudlow, CNBC host. “This correction will run its course until the middle of the year. Then things will pick up again, because not even Greenspan can stop the Internet economy.” He’s still hosting his own cable show.

April 2000: Myron Kandel, CNN. “The bottom line is in, before the end of the year, the Nasdaq and Dow will be at new record highs.”

September 2000: Jim Cramer, host of “Mad Money.” Sun Microsystems “has the best near-term outlook of any company I know.” It fell from $60 to below $3 in two years.

November 2000: Louis Rukeyser on CNN. “Over the next year or two the market will be higher, and I know over the next five to 10 years it will be higher.”

December 2000: Jeffrey Applegate, Lehman strategist. “The bulk of the correction is behind us, so now is the time to be offensive, not defensive.” Another sucker’s rally.

December 2000: Alan Greenspan. “The three- to five-year earnings projections of more than a thousand analysts … have generally held firm. Such expectations, should they persist, bode well for continued capital deepening and sustained growth.”

January 2001: Suze Orman, financial guru. “The QQQ, they’re a buy. They may go down, but if you dollar-cost average, where you put money every single month into them, I think, in the long run, it’s the way to play the Nasdaq.” The QQQ fell 60% further.

March 2001: Maria Bartiromo, CNBC anchor. “The individual out there is actually not throwing money at things that they do not understand, and is actually using the news and using the information out there to make smart decisions.”

April 2001: Abby Joseph Cohen, Goldman Sachs. “The time to be nervous was a year ago. The S&P was overvalued, it’s now undervalued.” Markets fell 18 more months.

August 2001: Lou Dobbs, CNN. “Let me make it very clear. I’m a bull, on the market, on the economy. And let me repeat, I am a bull.”

Posted in Main Page | 11 Comments