The great disconnect

US consumer sentiment tumbled in November to near the lowest level on record, as the government shutdown weighed on the economic outlook and financial strains soured views on personal finances. See, US Consumer Sentiment Declines to Near-Lowest on Record:

The preliminary November sentiment index dropped 3.3 points to 50.3, just above a June 2022 reading of 50 that was the weakest in University of Michigan data back to 1978.

A measure of current economic conditions slumped 6.3 points to a record low of 52.3 as anxiety mounted about the impact of the government shutdown.

The decline in sentiment was evident across age, income, education levels and political affiliation; interviews for this release closed before Tuesday’s elections.

The headline reading was far below the lows posted in all recessions dating back to the early 1950s.

Current personal finances (below in red since 2009) and buying conditions for big-ticket items like houses, cars, and durable goods (in blue) were reported as the worst since mid-2022 and 2008, respectively, while the perceived chance of losing a job (in yellow) was the highest since the pandemic.

One key exception: thanks to a 12% rise in the S&P 500 since last December, along with rebounds in other risk markets, consumers in the top third of stock owners reported a 11% increase in sentiment (green line below vs non-stockholders in orange and all stockholders in black, since 2019). This is the group that has been holding up consumer spending, too. See, Feeling Great About the Economy? You Must Own Stocks.
The trouble is that this same group, which has seen the most significant increase in its investment portfolios, is now most exposed and vulnerable to the inevitable next episode of market weakness.

We saw this pattern (see above) when risk assets (stocks, credit, cryptocurrencies, commodities and precious metals) tumbled across the board in 2020, and again from December 2021 through November 2022 (red bars highlighted below).

In both incidents, the sentiment and outlook of financial asset owners soured sharply, see the November 2022 report, “Affluent Canadians Re-Evaluating Finances and Retirement Plans Amid Economic Concerns.

Most high-net-worth (HNW) Canadians (defined as having $1M or more in investable assets) reported feeling more stressed about the impact a volatile economy will have on their wealth and lifestyle, according to a new study by IG Private Wealth Management (IGPWM), a division of IG Wealth Management.

…While three-quarters (74 per cent) work with a financial advisor, less than half (45 per cent) of those that do have a holistic financial plan that addresses all dimensions of their financial life.

Having our life savings ride asset bubbles up and down is an unstable, vulnerable way to live, especially as we near and enter retirement. It also makes the economy more prone to crashes.

The latest market rebound has convinced many that the business cycle has been repealed and financial markets can thrive independent of the real world. Periods of disconnect are common, but permanent indifference would be unprecedented.

Wall Street has been called a casino with better lighting; unfortunately, those seeking investment advice mostly find ‘experts’ who act more like bookies than fiduciary advisers. Individuals need to consider the game and odds they wish to play.

Posted in Main Page | Comments Off on The great disconnect

About That: Are Trump’s global tariffs illegal?

Good overview of the legal issues in this segment.

Has Congress given the U.S. president the power to impose sweeping tariffs through the International Emergency Economic Powers Act? The Supreme Court will make a decision in a ruling that could restrain the Trump administration’s primary economic and foreign policy tool. Andrew Chang breaks down the central arguments for and against President Donald Trump’s use of the statute to impose worldwide tariffs — and explains why the justices don’t seem convinced. Here is a direct video link.

Posted in Main Page | Comments Off on About That: Are Trump’s global tariffs illegal?

“Helping” people into lifelong debt

Mortgage rates are lower than they were a year ago, and home prices have fallen in many areas. Still, home affordability remains the worst in decades (US ratio below since 2009).
The culprits are high prices and operating costs, which skyrocketed in the aftermath of the pandemic. The median US home price (402K in Q1 2025) was about 5x the median household income nationally (83k), compared with a 50-year norm of 3 to 4x (shown below since 1975).

In Canada, the numbers are worse: the average national home sale price ($676k in September) was 7.2x the median household income ($93k before tax). Affordability varies by area (shown below, courtesy of WOWA.ca). Still, only Regina, Saskatchewan, and Edmonton, Alberta, had average home sale prices below 4x the median household income, compared with 6.5 to 12.7x in major population centers in Ontario and British Columbia.

There’s a strong correlation between inflated home prices and inflated debt. In Canada, mortgages account for 75% of the record $3.07 trillion in household debt (StatsCan Q1 2025). In America, mortgages account for 70% of household debt across all age groups from 30 to 70+ (Bianco Research).

Fewer and fewer households are likely to have their homes paid off by retirement, and this greatly diminishes the ability to save for retirement and other goals/needs.

Apparently, the Trump administration is touting a solution in extending US mortgage amortizations to 50 years, up from the current 30-year norm. President Trump highlighted the plan on his social platform, and the head of the US Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), Bill Pulte, responded that they are indeed “working on The 50-year Mortgage — a complete game-changer.”

This is presented as a solution to lower monthly payments for homebuyers, especially younger people (HousingWire). See, Trump proposes a 50-year mortgage to help affordability:

Using Fannie Mae‘s mortgage loan calculator with a 20% down payment and a mortgage rate of 6.575%, the breakdown below shows payments at different home prices and mortgage terms. This is just for principal and interest and doesn’t include property taxes or insurance. It also assumes the same interest rate for a longer-term loan, which is not a given.

$300,000
30-year fixed: $1,529 principal and interest
40-year fixed: $1,418 principal and interest
50-year fixed: $1,366 principal and interest

$400,000
30-year fixed: $2,038 principal and interest
40-year fixed: $1,891 principal and interest
50-year fixed: $1,822 principal and interest

$500,000
30-year fixed: $2,548 principal and interest
40-year fixed: $2,363 principal and interest
50-year fixed: $2,277 principal and interest

Extending amortization to 50 years lowers the monthly cash flow burden, which might elevate some demand (support prices) in some housing markets.

But from a risk/cost of capital perspective, longer amortizations balloon total interest paid, slow equity accumulation, and drastically reduce the borrower’s long-term saving and spending ability.

The cost of borrowing is hardly ever acknowledged in home-buying discussions beyond talk of the monthly payment, but the difference between borrowing $600k over 15, 20, 30, and 50-year amortization periods is mind-blowing (table below courtesy of DCP).

Paying a home off in 30 years versus 15 years results in a 123% increase in total interest costs, and amortizing over 50 years results in a 307% increase in interest costs over the life of the loan. In other words, a $600k home loan ends up costing $926k over 15 years, $1.052m over 20 years, $1.329m over 30 years and $1.962m over 50 years.And this is just principal and interest payments, to say nothing of property taxes, insurance, maintenance and utilities.

Homes are lovely to own when they are comfortable and affordable. But they are not a wise financial decision at every price, and ‘helping’ people into lifelong debt is not helping them or our economy, which depends on people spending less in the near term so we can build up savings and investment for longer-term needs and sustainability.

Posted in Main Page | Comments Off on “Helping” people into lifelong debt