We are living through some really challenging times. This video clip captures the evolution of the unemployment epidemic that has been sweeping America for the past two years. Also sobering to realize that the percentage of people under-employed is actually even higher than the US in most other countries around the world:
Hat tip: The Big Picture Blog
This morning's market letter from John Mauldin is worth a read: Is this a Recovery?
The article does a good job of explaining the reality behind this week's “positive” jobs report and how today's deficits are likely to create a cumulative drag on GDP for the next 5-10 years.
It also addresses a question that I have been hearing a lot from readers lately: “how can I make my investment portfolio pay me 5-6%+ a year in present conditions.” With interest rates presently at 75-year lows, and equities historically within the “most expensive” range, the most responsible answer is that you cannot make your retirement portfolio safely produce withdrawals today of more than 4% without a 1 in 2 chance that you will run out of capital within 20 years. Not acceptable odds in my view.
Ed Easterling of Crestmont Research has written an excellent paper explaining that the greatest challenge to investors in secular bear climates is that valuations start out in the most expensive range, and take years to work their way down to least expensive again. Today with PE's north of 20 we are back in the least likely to be rewarding, highest risk range for equity investing. Ignoring this fact and trying to implement a passive allocation to equities in an effort to increase yield has an unacceptably high chance of failure:
“…the level of valuation (P/E) has a direct impact on success and
ending capital. The implication for today’s investor is that the likelihood of financial
success in retirement is considerably less than most pundits are advocating. Twenty
years from now, if the response is “who knew?” it won’t be much comfort for retirees in
the employment line at Wal-Mart. This is especially true since a rational understanding
of history and the drivers of longer-term stock market returns can help today’s retiree to
avoid that “surprise.” I assure you that these are not fear-driven statements, but rather
insights that are based upon history and the financial principle that valuation is a major
determinant of future returns…
BUT I WANT 5% (RATHER THAN JUST 4%)…
A number of advocates and studies provide for 5% withdrawal rates: “I only want
$50,000 from my million dollars” and have it last for 30 years. The calculated success
rate for that rate of withdrawal is 73%. Pretty good odds…except when we consider the
impact of valuation…starting when the average PE of stocks is 18.5 and higher [like today] those trying to withdraw 5% a year from their investment accounts have more than a 53% chance of running out of money within 21 years.
See: Destitute At 80: Retiring In Secular Cycles:.
The good news is we don't have to just buy and hope with equities at today's valuations. We can exercise more control and care in timing our exposure for a higher probability of rewarding outcomes. But it’s not easy. It takes a lot more discipline, patience and enlightenment from investment managers and clients in order to manage well through these conditions. The keys are placing very strict controls on risk exposure, and planning to earn and withdraw less over the next few years. Trying to dictate our income demands to our portfolios through secular bear climates is a recipe for financial disaster.
Interesting article on the Australian housing market today seems rather eerily similar to my concerns and comments about Canada of late:
Government injections and an artificially re-inflated Chinese economy have translated into a final burst of excess and euphoria in the Australian housing market the past several months. The net result is that already high leverage and prices have now moved to reckless leverage and precariously perched prices:
• Aussie house prices have doubled in the past 10 years
• prices are up 13.6% over the past year, and 30% over the past 3 years
• loans are more than 120% of bank deposits
• average home price in Sydney is 9.1 x the annual median income, for the entire country it is now 6.8x (Canada is here now too), making it the most expensive real estate in the world. These numbers compare with 2.9x in the US, 5.1x in the UK, NY, London, and San Francisco are all about 7x on this metric.
• many Aussie homeowners now pay more than 50% of their after-tax earnings to service their mortgage
• rates have been historically low but are now rising. Most home owners are feeling the strain having not locked in, they are still floating their rates:
“Although the housing subsidy has been phased out, the government has created the equivalent of a sub-prime class of homeowner who probably should not own a house in the first place. If the local economy proves strong and rates climb further foreclosures are on the way, and if the Chinese worry about their inflation, putting a brake on their growth, Australia will slow as well, causing more problems for homeowners. Worst of all might be a double-dip recession in the US, slowing China and the world economy once again…”
See the whole article here: Is Australia’s luck about to run out?
