Inconvenient truth: price matters

Bitcoin is off nearly 55% from its November peak, and 40% of holders are now underwater on their investments, according to new data from Glassnode.

That percentage is even higher when you isolate for the short-term holders who got skin in the game in the last six months when the price of bitcoin peaked at around $69,000.


And it’s not just the cryptos, the whole sector that’s sprung up around them is getting crushed, see Coinbase shares plunge almost 80% from November, amid a sell-off of cryptos and funds.

As mentioned in the CNBC segment, ARK Innovation ETF (in white below)-which was buying Bitcoin, Tesla and other innovators without concern for price or valuation, has now fallen more than 70% and given back all of its much-hyped “outperformance” as against the S&P 500 index (in blue).  This was inevitable.  More mean reversion is yet to come.

Posted in Main Page | Comments Off on Inconvenient truth: price matters

Negative carry properties increase downside risks

Even when we don’t owe a mortgage, personal use real estate is negative-carry–we spend money to maintain it rather than it paying us.

As an investment property, real estate is supposed to generate enough cash flow to carry itself.  If it doesn’t, owners are out of pocket to keep it afloat.  This is the definition of speculation– where you own the asset because you hope it will go up in price enough over your holding period to pay back carrying costs and then some.  It’s a risky business for individuals because rental income and our income from other sources can fluctuate with the economic cycle, making negative carry harder and sometimes impossible to maintain during periods of stress.

In October 2019, I noted that a poll by investment-research firm Veritas found that only half of would-be real estate investors in Canada (primarily polled in the GTA and Vancouver) were earning net positive rental income. Of the other half, 18% said they were breaking even, and a third said they were losing money.  See:  Canadian Real Estate Investors are losing money, pose a risk to the system: Veritas.

With median prices doubling in the past two years, the math for many investment properties has grown even more negative.  Now interest rates have moved sharply higher. An estimated 15% of property buyers across developed markets are all-cash buyers (anecdotally, in Canada, it seems to be less), with 85% dependent on financing.  No wonder the Globe is reporting this week that Some new landlords are losing money, as shown in the charts below.

The average price of condos sold in 2020 that were subsequently leased within 12 months of the owner taking possession was just over $600,000, with an average annual property tax bill of $2,235 and average condo fees of $514 a month.

With a down payment of 20 percent and what was then a competitive five-year fixed mortgage rate of 2.29 per cent, the average monthly carrying cost of an average-priced property would work out to around $2,800, according to calculations by The Globe and Mail. But the average rent for the group properties tracked by Mr. Pasalis was less than $2,250, yielding a monthly loss of over $550.

It’s an even grimmer picture for investors who rented out homes, who could face an average monthly cash flow shortage of nearly $1,160, according to Mr. Pasalis’ data and Globe and Mail calculations.

When many people have negative carry, it magnifies the downside for the property market, lenders and the economy.

Posted in Main Page | Comments Off on Negative carry properties increase downside risks

Contagion: rising rates, falling stocks, home prices and the economy

Interest rates have risen sharply, and financial and housing markets are under pressure. With households holding a record amount of their net worth in highly-levered assets, this cycle’s contagion risks are higher than average.   It’s another good time to read or re-read Robert Frank’s timeless 2011 book The High Beta Rich. Nicholas Gerli connects the dots very well in the segments below.

Netflix and Robinhood recently announced large layoffs. Both are large tech companies whose stock prices have collapsed in recent months. This is part of a crash in the stock market with the S&P 500 down 14% and NASDAQ 22% Year to Date. As the performance of these companies continue to erode, more layoffs will be announced. That’s because a shocking number of companies in America LOSE MONEY. 44% of the NASDAQ has negative earnings. 67% of Public Companies in San Francisco. 57% of Companies in Boston. As interest rates and inflation continue to rise, these companies will struggle to fund operations and be forced to layoffs employees. And potentially shutdown altogether. This could trigger a massive Recession and Housing Crash, particularly in tech-driven cities and Housing Markets such as San Francisco, Seattle, Boston, Austin, and Denver. The Netflix and Robinhood layoffs were just the start. Historically, it takes about 6-months from a big correction in the stock market before heavy layoffs in the economy begin to occur. That’s what happened in the Dotcom Bust of 2001 and the Financial Crash in 2008. That suggests the layoff spike in April 2022 could be a prelude to much larger layoffs, and unemployment claims, in the Summer of 2022.  Here is a direct video link.

How likely is coming correction in the housing market? If one occurs, how bad could it be? Which markets are most vulnerable? And which looks best positioned? For answers to these important questions, I’m pleased to welcome Nicholas Gerli to the program. Nick is the CEO of re: venture consulting which provides business analytics and market research on US real estate.  Here is a direct video link.

Posted in Main Page | Comments Off on Contagion: rising rates, falling stocks, home prices and the economy