The truth about lump sums: most people screw them up

Here’s a sobering stat from the National Endowment for Financial Education:  70% of people who suddenly receive a large amount of money go through it all in just a few years.  This is the reality, whether funds come from the sale of a business or real estate, stock picks, the lottery, an inheritance, or other windfalls.

Classic errors are over-estimating the amount of income that can be safely produced /withdrawn without depleting principal, too-high spending, wasteful purchases, giving too much to others, bad investment recommendations and aggressive risk-taking.

As I have explained many times, the best way to preserve savings is to see the capital as an annuity and design it for principal security and reinvested income.  Anyone planning to withdraw more than 3% a year–30k from a million, 3k a year on $100,000–is being aggressive and most likely will deplete their principal too quickly in the process.

For more tips on using lump sums to gain lasting improvement to one’s financial health see Smart Ways to Handle an Inheritance.

Posted in Main Page | Comments Off on The truth about lump sums: most people screw them up

Understanding generational pain and how to ease it

Longer life expectancy as well as years of overspending and debt accumulation along with two decades of precarious financial markets, and lower-than-average income yields, are prompting Baby Boomers (age 73 to 55) to stay in the workforce longer than past generations.

Case in point, the US labor force participation rate for boomers in the 65-69 age group was 32.3% in 2017 compared with 19.5% in 1987. For 70-74-year-olds it was 19.6% compared with 10.2% in 1987. This has placed older workers in direct competition with younger workers looking to for jobs and career experience. It has also prompted younger people to stay in school longer and seek more education. Not surprisingly, Millennials (born 1981 to 1996, now age 23 to 38) are the most educated and student-debt-encumbered generation ever. See more illuminating stats on their wide cultural and ethnic diversity in The millennial generation and Millennials outnumber Baby Boomers.

As a result, Millennials are today in worse financial shape than every living generation that preceded them, and questions are mounting about how and whether they will be able to recover in time to form traditional households, raise children and fund the benefits and investment on which society is depending. See ‘Playing catch-up in the game of life. Millennials approach middle age in crisis:

Hobbled by the financial crisis and recession that struck as they began their working life, Americans born between 1981 and 1996 have failed to match every other generation of young adults born since the Great Depression. They have less wealth, less property, lower marriage rates and fewer children, according to new data that compare generations at similar ages.

Even with record levels of education, the troubles of millennials have delayed traditional adult milestones in ways expected to alter the nation’s demographic and economic contours through the end of the century.

Millennials helped drive the number of U.S. births to their lowest levels in 32 years. That means fewer workers in the future to support Social Security and other public programs for the ballooning population of retirees.

The mainstream is finally catching on that the financial weakness of Millennials–83 million in America compared with 75 million remaining Boomers–is one of the most pressing challenges for consumption-dependent economies and older generations counting on downsizing assets to younger buyers. See: Millennial home-buyers may never come knocking, as an example.

Policies to alleviate what’s binding here must eschew the obsession with debt-fueled consumption and asset bubbles that has dominated for the last 20 years, and instead focus on helping people of all ages reduce debt and increase net income while reducing their cost of living expenditures. This means lowering the cost of education, housing, healthy food, energy and transportation for the masses. Fortunately, technological innovation and fresh thinking can yield much help, but we do need to let status quo business, political and social models evolve in support of greater resource sharing, less waste and more efficiency.

Posted in Main Page | Comments Off on Understanding generational pain and how to ease it

Loose lending standards are the cancer not the cure

The Bank of Canada (BOC) last week flagged the fragile nature of highly indebted Canadian households and said 42% of households would struggle to refinance their mortgage if home prices fall 20%.  While mortgage and real estate brokers are calling for a re-softening of lending standards in the face of housing weakness, BOC head Stephen Poloz said he does not support such ideas.  Since record debt is already plaguing Canadian households (and businesses), making it easier to add more, is not an idea that rational minds can endorse.  See:  ‘I would frown upon it’:  Poloz on calls to loosen mortgage rules.

A chart of the BOC data below, confirms, as I have mentioned for some time, that the percentage of households with debt above a precarious 350% of income (blue bars) is highest in the most populous provinces–Ontario and BC–where shelter prices rose the most over the past decade. See: Why so many Canadians could be in so much trouble in an economic shock.

For the same reasons, housing equity makes up 40% and 50%+ of net worth in both provinces (gold bars).  As home prices and related costs leapt, households have funded them at the expense of other savings and investment. This balance sheet–and economy–concentration in real estate serves to intensify negative shocks as property prices can quickly and dramatically retreat and debt levels do not.  There is no quick fix; deleveraging cycles have their own timeline and take back capital from speculators and the unprepared as they go.

Posted in Main Page | Comments Off on Loose lending standards are the cancer not the cure