Neil Barofsky on JP Morgan’s “hedging” losses

Here is a point typically missed in the hours of breathless banter on bankers’ “hedging strategies”. Leverage magnifies risk: it increases profits on the way up and predictably vaporizes capital when asset prices reverse course. On the opposite end of the spectrum– a true hedge neutralizes risk. A hedge is designed to make the risk free rate-today nil–with no gains and no losses.

For several years now, Investment bankers have been trading with leverage for profit, and calling it hedging. This would be their own suicide mission if they were doing it on their own risk. But they have not. They have kept the gains, and given tax payers all the losses, because they are now improperly under the protection of Central Bankers and governments who are mandated to backstop the banking system. The solution is simple. Separate banks from risk traders. Let the “traders” live and die by their own sword. How much pain must the world endure before this simple rule is reinstated?

Neil Barofsky, former special inspector for the U.S. Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program and a Bloomberg Television contributing editor, talks about JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s $2 billion trading loss. Here is the direct link.

This entry was posted in Main Page. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Neil Barofsky on JP Morgan’s “hedging” losses

  1. michael says:

    I don’t understand…with all the incredibly bright and well spoken women to chose from these “news” mediums keep pushing the bimboesque …..who is their audience?

    Reform in the banking sector simply will not happen. As long as the taxpayer is made the patsy the corruption will continue. The Big O had a chance to stop the madness but chose to intensify it. He is pretty much assured of a second term as his opposition is truly outclassed.

    Nothing will change until the status quo self destructs….which it most certainly will but it will not be with the help of the regulators or “elected” representatives.

    But hey what’s to fret about, the consumer is positive so everything must be just fine no!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.