The effects of climate change–believe it or not

A discussion on the role of global warming in storms like Sandy with Paul Barrett of Bloomberg Businessweek, Bryan Walsh of Time Magazine, Steve Coll of the New Yorker and Charlie Rose. Here is a direct link.

Posted in Main Page | 10 Comments

Sandy costs: net negative

New York City Comptroller John Liu says Hurricane Sandy will result in permanent economic losses of $100-$200 million a day in New York City. Here is a direct link.

A distinction of Hurricane Sandy when compared with other natural disasters, is that Sandy hit some of the most densely populated and expensive real estate in the world. As a result, economic damage is magnified and not felt by 3 or 5 million people, but by 60 million+. Only a portion of this damage will be recouped from insurance. The remaining costs will be absorbed by government, consumers and small business. Retail sales have been weak for months now, millions of individuals will now have less to spend on the economically important holiday shopping season over the next couple of months while they are rebuilding. Some of the demand lost will be recouped over coming months, but near-term for an already weak economy, lost revenue is clearly negative. In addition, some of the loss will be permanent and never recovered.

Posted in Main Page | 2 Comments

Customers needed

As politicians prattle about how they “make jobs” and business leaders boast about how they are the true “job creators”, the humble truth is that customers create jobs.  To have sustained consumer spending, customers need–not even more credit on credit or emergency hand outs–customers need earnings.  However the official methods try to estimate progress on the jobs front, (only to revise numbers lower once the real data is tabulated) the truth is found in the following chart of the change in average hourly earnings. It is clear that while some jobs have been added over the past 4 years, they have been funded by wage losses in the workforce.

What’s more the repeated stimulus interventions of Central Banks have directly exasperated this trend toward lower hourly earnings, because QE liquidity flows not into the real economy, but directly into asset speculation. As QE flows push up commodity prices, companies offset the increase in their expenses by restricting wage growth.

The fact is that we are in a slow growth world and will be for a few more years as the weight of debt is worked off and written down. It is likely that wages in the west will continue to be under pressure through this period. What needs to happen however is that central banks must stop goosing asset prices so that input costs can come down as they must to reflect the reality of lower global demand. This will leave companies with more cash flow to pay wages. In addition, once share prices are lower, investors will be able to collect higher dividend yields without companies having to keep increasing their payouts to shareholders. This will leave companies with more cash flow to pay wages. And lastly, executives must take less for their own compensation in this new “post credit bubble” world. They have been outrageously over-paid over the past 20 years as executive compensation swelled to 300 x the average worker. This too will leave more cash flow for capital re-investment and wages for the workforce. These are the keys to bringing customers back into the economy. More customers will bring more jobs and wage growth. The rest is just noise and bluster.

Posted in Main Page | 3 Comments