Interesting opining re late day rebound

Futures were opening ugly this am, compounded by news that IBM, Texas Instruments and Goldman (couldn't happen to a better bunch of fell'as) missed earnings estimates. Then late today we saw some capital flows moving into stocks. One of the factors that may be fuelling speculation is a story out of NY that the Fed is going to announce they will stop paying interest on bank reserves where they are currently paying .25%. Here is Peter Bockvar's assessment on The Big Picture blog this aft:

This would be the Fed’s attempt to force banks to lend money instead of parking it at the Fed. In my opinion, this is the last bullet in the gun of the Fed and therefore is not going to be used so soon. An ISM going from 59 to 56.2 or the ISM services going from 55.4 to 53.8 for example is not going to move the Fed into such a dramatic phase of their policy. While I have no doubt that Bernanke will eventually go down this path, I think there is no way it happens for a while as the data is going to have to be really bad for them to spend their last shot in terms of shock, awe and impact.

This would be the Fed trying to basically smoke loan capital out of the banks and force lending into the economy (encore). My take is this intervention will be just as unsuccessful at stimulating lasting growth as any of the other emergency measures taken to date. You can't force a full person to eat. Consumers gorged on credit the past few years. They are full of it. They don't wish to borrow more, they wish to spend less, reduce debt and build up savings. Corporations are not interested in borrowing more or parting with their cash reserves to increase their capacity and production at a time when the world is so clearly drowning in over-capacity. The sooner we accept and re-price for a lower growth reality and stop wasting tax dollars on stop gap deferrals, the better we will be.

Posted in Main Page | 3 Comments

Bob Shiller: "Double-Dip concern is growing"


As an aside, Shiller's preferred price measure for stocks is not the notoriously misleading P/E of forward operating earnings touted by the perma-bull crowd. Shiller prefers an earnings estimate based on the 10-year average of actual net (not forward operating) earnings. This CAPE(Cyclically Adjusted Price to Earnings) ratio has proved a more realistic and useful indicator of relative stock valuations over time and it is noteworthy that by this metric the S&P 500 at 1087 recently measures about 45% over-valued. A 45% discount would take the S&P back to about 600 if prices were to re-couple with economic reality here. At this point, we are watching 850-875 as a downside level of key support. Maybe it could hold there…if not then the November 2008 and March 2009 lows will be back on the radar. As for the Canadian TSX, there is no historical basis to assume that it is not also at significant downside risk here. At 11,500 the TSX is similarly over-valued and heavily levered to a dipping US economy. The key downside test would be 9000 for the TSX and 7500 if panic sets in again.

Posted in Main Page | 2 Comments

BNN Mon morning at 8:35 am est

Ms. Park was a guest on BNN with Michael Kane this morning, July 19 at 8:35 am est. A link to the interview is available here on the BNN web site.

Posted in Main Page | 1 Comment