Serious question: how did you fare in past bear markets?

As two years of emergency fiscal and monetary support retreat, global growth, inflation and speculative frenzy are as well.

Individuals holding equity funds and portfolios at the most extreme valuations in a hundred years have an opportunity to consider:  How did you feel and react in the 2000-2003 and 2007-09 bear markets?

Now consider that you are that much older and have less ability to wait years trying to make back losses again.   Jason Zweig offers some lucid thoughts in Why you should sit out of the mayhem, Jan 25, 2022

“…the best guide to how you will behave in the next crash is how you acted in the last one. If you can’t take the pain, you should feel no shame about staying on—or moving to—the sidelines…Market panics are the indispensable hygiene of markets, the natural way overvalued assets come back into line, making future returns more attractive.

Every investor should be thankful that stocks do go down, for two reasons.

First, if stocks always went up, they would be riskless—and their returns would end up being paltry. The short-term pain of loss is the price we pay for the potential for meaningful long-term gain.

Second, if you have plenty of cash and courage to withstand further declines, other people’s fear could be your cue to act. As I wrote in 2009: “It is sometimes said that to be an intelligent investor, you must be unemotional. That isn’t true; instead, you should be inversely emotional.”

That means market declines don’t have to be a cause of consternation. They can be an opportunity.”

Upside from bear markets can be huge but only for those who preserve their capital, cash and mental strength so they can buy when others liquidate.

Posted in Main Page | Comments Off on Serious question: how did you fare in past bear markets?

Real bottoms deflate valuations and hubris

Late cycle-performers, financials and energy are now rolling over to confirm the bear market that small-cap stocks began last November (the Russell 2000 is -16% since).

Word to the wise, as we move now into the slowing growth and inflation portion of the market cycle, commodities, equities, and corporate debt tend to be the worst-performing assets, with energy, tech, industrials and financial companies the worst-performing equities.

Canada’s TSX index concentrated 32% in financials (20% in just the five largest banks) and 13% in oil and gas companies, tends to hold up longer on these late-cycle sectors before tumbling with them. We’re into the tumbling part now. As a basket, Canadian financials (XFN) are so far -5% and oil and gas -8% from mid-January highs.

As in 2000 with Nortel and 2008 with Research in Motion, Canada had a tech standout this cycle, Shopify, which soared during the pandemic, dubiously becoming the most expensive Canadian company when it peaked with the TSX in November 2021; it’s -46% and the broad market -5.6% since.

A further 10% decline from here will return the TSX to its February 2019 cycle peak, and from there, a retest of the March 2020 lows remains our base case. If the selling were to end there, the benchmark index will have given back all gains made since February 2006 and be (as it was in March 2020) just 9% higher than where it topped in September 2000–now over 21 years ago (circled in my partner Cory Venable’s March 2020 TSX chart below). A best-case scenario would be a retest and hold of its March 2020 low (-38% below present levels).


In past secular bear markets during the 1930s and 1970s–beginning from jubilant peaks in sentiment and valuations–markets retested prior cycle lows in successive bear markets over 15 to 20 years. As highlighted in Cory’s March 2020 monthly chart below, this suggests that the Canadian stock market could revisit the 9,000 to 10,000 range for the third time in the months or quarters ahead. This is how secular bears manage to repeatedly maul and finally annihilate irrational exuberance.

A similar pattern could unfold for the grotesquely overbought S&P 500. As shown in Cory’s latest chart of the index below since 1997, the 9% price decline to date is barely perceptible in the big picture. A durable bottom is very far from nigh with a monthly relative strength indicator (RSI) above 57. A 65% decline from here would only retest the prior cycle tops (the 1500 range) for the S&P! A best-case scenario?

We remain cautiously optimistic that the present downdraft could be the much-needed fourth, and potentially final, cyclical bear of this secular bear period. Still, we note that bear market bottoms are a process that typically takes several months–sometimes a couple of years–to complete (see the rectangles around bottoming action in the TSX charts above).

While the investment sales cartel urges us to never sell and buy at every price, the truth is that we can’t have the mental and financial strength to capitalize on bear markets unless we first protect our capital from their losses and set aside significant cash reserves to buy when present holders are finally liquidating in desperation.

No doubt, there will be exceptional investment opportunities ahead for those who are liquid and prepared for them in advance. But amid the cacophony of confident dip-buyers, remember, when it’s finally a cycle bottom, no one will feel like buying’s a good idea.

Posted in Main Page | Comments Off on Real bottoms deflate valuations and hubris

Danielle’s bi-weekly market update

Interest rates, mortgage rates, real estate, equities, and more in this discussion.

Danielle was a guest with Jim Goddard on Talk Digital Network, talking about recent developments in the world economy and markets.  You can listen to an audio clip of the segment here.

Posted in Main Page | Comments Off on Danielle’s bi-weekly market update