Juggling Dynamite

Recent high-profile fights between different groups of computer-enabled-levered traders are just more evidence of the wild-west that poor oversight, purchased advantage and revolving-door appointments have made of so-called ‘investment’ markets.  The loss-cycle this accentuates will hurt all participants, the overall economy and taxpayers.  Shit-show exemplified.  Senator Warren correctly connects the dots in this interview.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren lambasted the Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday for the regulator’s failure to take action after a dayslong blitz of market speculation.

“We need an SEC that has clear rules about market manipulation and then has the backbone to get in and enforce those rules,” Warren said. “To have a healthy stock market, you’ve got to have a cop on the beat.  That should be the SEC,” she added. “They need to step up and do their job.” Here is a direct video link.

Good article on the frenzy of retail participants inflating stocks (and related capital loss prospects) with call options, see How option’s trading could be fuelling a stock market bubble.  Here’s a taste:

Since the sharp setback for tech stocks in September, retail traders have redoubled their interest in buying single-stock options, which have become especially popular among online amateurs who gather on Reddit and Discord to swap ideas and fawn over screenshots of both purported wins and gut-wrenching losses.

The momentum will probably last until markets turn down and these newly minted traders experience painful losses that, for many, will be the first in what has been an extremely short investing career.

Also, see FT:  Weaponised options trading

And, The Reddit GameStop Bubble is Just a Game–For Now:

There are two main causes of big market moves. The healthier one is when new information comes to light about a company, an industry or the economy at large, and financial assets are repriced to reflect it. The other is when market participants buy or sell in a rush, often because they suddenly need to protect their finances—in which case asset prices don’t convey much useful information.

The latter is at play now. Hedge funds’ short bets have been unsettled, forcing them to buy back the stocks to limit their losses. Also, punters have been using options contracts to prop up their targets. Such instruments can amplify even small market moves, because they force banks to take the other side and then hedge the risk by buying the actual underlying stocks. It can create a feedback loop: Those stocks then go up, and the value of the options tied to them increases even more, forcing banks to hedge further, and so on.

I first heard Jeremy Siegel speak when he was feverishly bullish on stocks and promoting the second edition of his book “Stocks for the Long-Run” in 1999 despite valuations and sentiment being at century-plus highs.  He’s not changed his thesis through two decades where stocks have dramatically underperformed the compound returns of treasury bonds.  His calls for inflation now still fly in the face of historical evidence suggesting the opposite.  Economist David Rosenberg articulates an opposing case well in this segment.

We have never seen a buildup in cash balances as we’ve seen now,” says Jeremy Siegel, Wharton finance professor. “I think anything connected to commodities, including land, is going to be a really good buy.” He joins ‘Closing Bell’ to discuss why he believes we will have higher inflation, which will ultimately hurt bond holders.  Here is a direct video link.